Skip to content
Lineofcredit.org.nz
A row of unoccupied training machines under high ceilings
Guide

A rate is not a price on a facility like this.

Two facilities quoted at the same rate can cost very different amounts, because the rate applies to what is drawn and several of the charges do not.

MS
Matt Stiles Editor
Published 8 September 2026 Last reviewed 8 September 2026 Read time 12 min

The short version

Five lines that make two quotes comparable.

  • The rate covers one charge out of several. Interest on the drawn balance is the only charge that responds to usage, and on a lightly used facility it is not the largest.
  • The line fee is charged on the limit. A larger limit costs more to hold whether or not the extra headroom is ever used.
  • The right comparison is an annual total. Interest on the expected average drawn balance, plus every standing charge, in dollars.
  • Usage decides which quote wins. A heavy user should optimise the rate; a light user should optimise the line fee. The same two quotes reverse.
  • Indicative only. This is general information rather than advice, and every figure is illustrative.

The charges

Every charge, and what it is calculated on.

Not every facility carries all of these, and a proposal naming only the first is describing a fraction of the cost.

ChargeCalculated onFrequencyResponds to usage
InterestThe drawn balance, dailyCharged monthlyYes
Line or facility feeThe approved limitMonthly or annuallyNo
Commitment feeThe undrawn portionPeriodicallyInversely
Establishment feeThe facilityOnceNo
Review or renewal feeThe facilityAt each reviewNo
Excess feeA balance above the limitPer occurrenceOnly if exceeded
Dishonour feeA failed paymentPer occurrenceOnly on failure
Security and registration costsDisbursementsAs incurredNo

Indicative charge structures across the New Zealand market. Any particular facility is priced by its lender.

The two that behave oddly

A line fee and a commitment fee are not the same thing.

A line fee is charged on the whole approved limit regardless of what is drawn. A commitment fee is charged on the undrawn portion, so it falls as the facility is used and rises as it is repaid. They are frequently confused and they produce opposite incentives.

Under a line fee, a business pays the same to hold the limit whether it uses it or not, so an oversized limit is straightforwardly wasteful. Under a commitment fee, a facility drawn heavily costs less in fees and more in interest, and the two partly offset.

Most small business facilities in New Zealand carry a line fee. Committed facilities at larger amounts more often carry a commitment fee, which is consistent with what each is paying for: capacity in the first case, and an obligation to keep capacity available in the second.

Worked example

Two quotes, and how the answer reverses.

Lender A offers a $200,000 limit at 12% with a 1.0% line fee. Lender B offers the same limit at 14% with a 0.3% line fee. On rate alone A is clearly cheaper, and most comparisons would stop there.

A business expecting an average drawn balance of $140,000 pays A roughly $16,800 in interest plus $2,000 in line fee, which is $18,800. It pays B roughly $19,600 plus $600, which is $20,200. A wins by $1,400.

A business expecting an average drawn balance of $25,000 pays A roughly $3,000 plus $2,000, which is $5,000. It pays B roughly $3,500 plus $600, which is $4,100. B wins by $900. Same two quotes, opposite answers, decided entirely by how much the facility is actually used.

Illustrative annual cost

Heavy user, lender A
~$18,800
Heavy user, lender B
~$20,200
Light user, lender A
~$5,000
Light user, lender B
~$4,100

Illustrative on stated assumptions and rounded. Not a quote or offer of credit.

The question that settles it

The annual total on your own expected usage, in dollars.

Give each lender the same two numbers, the limit being sought and the average drawn balance the business realistically expects, and ask for the total annual cost including every fee. Any lender can produce it, the answers are directly comparable, and the exercise surfaces the standing charges that a rate comparison hides entirely. Where a lender will not produce it, that is informative in itself.

What moves the price

Four things that determine what a business is quoted.

Understanding these makes it clear which parts of a quote are negotiable and which follow from the position.

01

Security

The largest single lever. A facility secured over property prices materially below an unsecured one, and the difference persists for every year the facility runs.

02

Trading history and conduct

Length of record, consistency of income and how existing facilities have been conducted. A clean revolving history with another lender is a strong argument at a review.

03

Limit size

Larger facilities frequently price better per dollar and cost more in line fee. The two pull in opposite directions, which is why the total on expected usage is the only useful comparison.

04

Whether the facility is committed

A committed facility costs more, because the lender is obliged to keep the limit available. That premium is buying certainty rather than money.

Negotiating

Which charges actually move.

The establishment fee is the most negotiable, particularly where a business is moving a facility from another lender. It is a one-off, it costs the lender little to waive, and it is frequently reduced or removed on request rather than on argument.

The line fee moves less often and does move, particularly where the limit is larger than the business will realistically use. Asking whether a smaller limit at a lower fee would suit, and what that does to the rate, produces a more useful conversation than asking for a discount.

The rate moves least in a single conversation and most over time. A business with two more years of clean conduct, a lower average balance and a cleaner review history is a different proposition from the one that signed, and asking for a review of pricing at that point is ordinary rather than presumptuous.

Against other instruments

Where a revolving facility sits on cost.

Compared on the same drawn amount over the same period, so the structural differences show rather than the conventions.

FeatureRevolving facilityTerm loanBusiness card
Rate on the amount usedModerateLowerHighest
Standing chargesA line feeUsually none after establishmentAn annual fee
Cost if the money is not neededThe line fee onlyFull interestThe annual fee only
Cost if used briefly each monthSmallFull interestNothing, if cleared
Cost if drawn permanentlyHighLowerHighest

The last two rows describe the whole hierarchy. Cleared monthly, a card is cheapest; used for weeks at a time, a revolving facility; drawn permanently, a term loan. Very few businesses use all three deliberately, and the ones that do save real money.

The charge nobody budgets for

Review and renewal costs.

A facility reviewed annually may carry a review fee, and where security is involved there can be valuation and legal costs at renewal as well. On a small facility those can be a meaningful share of the annual cost and they are almost never included in the comparison at the outset.

They are also the charges most likely to be discovered rather than quoted. Asking what happens at review, what it costs and how often it happens is a fair question at the application stage, and the answer differs considerably between lenders.

For a business holding a facility for several years, the sum of review costs over the period can exceed the establishment fee it negotiated hard over at the start. Including them in the annual total puts them where they belong.

Method

How this guide was written, and its limits.

The charge structures described are those in general use in the New Zealand market, and the figures used are illustrative rather than any lenderโ€™s published pricing. Rates, line fees, review costs and what is negotiable vary considerably by lender, by security and by applicant.

No rate levels are published here for the same reason they are not published on the facility pages. A figure quoted on a page that stays up for months describes a market at a moment rather than an offer to a reader, and the only numbers that matter are those a lender puts in writing.

Nothing here is financial advice. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and what a particular business will be offered depends on facts a website cannot see.

Variable rates

What happens when the rate moves.

Most business revolving facilities in New Zealand are variable, which means the rate can move during the life of the facility. That is ordinarily tied to a reference rate or to the lenderโ€™s own business base rate, and the agreement sets out how changes are notified.

The practical consequence is that a facility compared and chosen on a rate can be at a different rate six months later. That is not a reason to ignore the rate, and it is a reason to weigh the standing charges and the limit at least as heavily, because those move less.

It also makes the annual review of the statement worth doing. A rate that has drifted upward without much prominence is a cost the business is carrying without having decided to, and asking about it is ordinary rather than confrontational.

What to ask before signing

Five questions with short answers.

Whether the facility is committed or uncommitted, because that decides how much weight to put on the limit. Whether there is a clean-down condition, because that decides whether the balance has to reach nil. What the review cycle is and what it costs, because those recur. What the excess and dishonour fees are, because those are avoidable once known. And what the total annual cost is on a stated limit and a stated average drawn balance.

All five have one-line answers and all five are in the agreement. Asking them at the application stage rather than reading them afterwards takes a few minutes and it is the difference between a facility that behaves as expected and one that produces surprises.

A lender that answers all five directly is also telling the business something useful about how the relationship will run, which is worth knowing before rather than after.

Where the money actually goes

Four charges ranked by what they cost across a year.

Ordered as they typically fall on a moderately used facility. The ranking reverses on a lightly used one, which is the point.

01

Interest on the drawn balance

Ordinarily the largest on any facility that is genuinely used, and the only charge that responds to how the business behaves. It is also the one most affected by repayment timing.

02

The line fee

Second on a used facility and first on a held one. Charged on the limit, so it is the reason an oversized limit costs money for nothing.

03

Review and renewal charges

Recurring, frequently unquoted at the outset, and larger where security requires revaluation. Over several years they add up to more than most establishment fees.

04

Excess and dishonour fees

Smallest in dollars and the most avoidable, and their real cost is the signal rather than the amount. A facility run with genuine headroom incurs neither.

A worked total

What a year on a modest facility actually costs.

A $100,000 limit at an indicative 14% with a 0.6% line fee, an average drawn balance of $30,000, a $500 establishment fee in year one and a $250 annual review charge. Interest is roughly $4,200, the line fee is $600, and the review charge is $250.

That is about $5,050 in a steady year and $5,550 in the first. Expressed against the average drawn balance it is roughly 18%, against a headline rate of 14%, and the gap is entirely the standing charges applied to a facility that is only three-tenths used.

The same facility drawn to $80,000 on average costs about $12,050, which is roughly 15% against the balance. The headline rate becomes more representative the more the facility is used, which is the single most useful thing to understand about comparing quotes on rate alone.

The security disbursements

The costs attached to taking security, which are not a fee.

Where a facility is secured, the register searches, the registration itself and the legal work are costs the business ordinarily bears, and they are passed through rather than charged as a fee. On a general security agreement over a business they are modest. Where property is involved, a valuation and property legal work on both sides make them considerably larger.

They are one-off in the first year and they recur wherever a review requires a fresh valuation, which on property-secured facilities is more common than businesses expect. Asking how often revaluation is required, and who pays for it, is a fair question at the outset.

Included in a first-year total they can change which of two offers is cheaper, particularly on a modest facility. Excluded, as they usually are from a quoted rate, they arrive as a surprise at settlement.

The largest component

What the drawn balance costs.

Interest on the average drawn balance is the component that responds to usage. Add the line fee and the standing charges to get the annual total. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.

Indicative interest cost

Weekly

Disclaimer

$175/week

$758 /month $9,100 a year while drawn
$200,000
$5,000 $500,000
$70,000
Nothing drawn Fully drawn
13.00% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

References

Sources

FAQ

Questions, answered

Why can two facilities at the same rate cost different amounts?

Because interest applies to the drawn balance while the line fee applies to the whole limit, and the standing charges apply regardless of either. A larger limit at the same rate costs more to hold.

What is a line fee?

A charge on the approved limit, payable whether or not the facility is used, because the lender is holding capacity available. On a lightly used facility it can be most of the annual cost.

What is a commitment fee?

A charge on the undrawn portion of a committed facility, so it falls as the facility is drawn. It is paying for the lenderโ€™s obligation to keep the limit available rather than for the capacity itself.

How do I compare two quotes properly?

Give each lender the limit sought and the average drawn balance realistically expected, and ask for the total annual cost including every fee, in dollars. Those figures are directly comparable and headline rates are not.

Which quote wins on a lightly used facility?

Ordinarily the one with the lower line fee, even at a higher rate, because the standing charge dominates when the drawn balance is small. On a heavily used facility the answer reverses.

Which charges are negotiable?

The establishment fee most readily, particularly when moving from another lender. The line fee sometimes, especially where the limit is larger than the business will use. The rate least in a single conversation and most over time.

Are review costs significant?

They can be, particularly where security requires revaluation. Over several years they can exceed the establishment fee, and they are almost never included in an initial comparison, which is why asking about them upfront is worthwhile.

Does a bigger limit always cost more?

In line fee, yes, since it is charged on the limit. In rate, frequently less, since larger facilities can price better per dollar. The two pull in opposite directions, which is why only the total on expected usage settles it.

What does security do to the price?

It is the largest single lever, and the effect persists every year the facility runs. A property-secured facility prices materially below an unsecured one and ordinarily carries a larger limit as well.

Is interest charged on fees?

Where fees are debited to the facility rather than paid separately, they become part of the drawn balance and accrue interest from that point. On a facility running near its limit they can also produce an excess.

Should pricing be reviewed after a few years?

Yes, and it rarely happens without being asked. A business with a longer clean record and a better usage pattern is a different credit proposition from the one that signed, and requesting a review is ordinary.

Is this guide financial advice?

No. It explains a pricing structure in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and what a particular business is offered depends on facts a website cannot see.

Disclaimer

Indicative content only. Not personalised financial advice.

A revolving facility is a standing commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the interest and fees recur for as long as it is held. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.

What this site is

A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.

What the figures show

Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.

What the lender decides

Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.

Commercial disclosure

Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.

Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.

This page is
coming soon.

Important information

About this site, the figures, and your protections.

Last reviewed 8 September 2026.

1. What this site is

Lineofcredit.org.nz is a New Zealand education site and a free repayment calculator. It is not a lender, not a broker, and not a registered financial adviser. We do not arrange credit, hold client money, or provide regulated financial advice as defined under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 6 or the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Act 2019. Nothing on this site is personalised financial advice.

2. The calculator and figures

All numbers shown by the calculator, in worked examples, and across the site are indicative only and modelled from the inputs entered. The figures are not a quote, not an offer of credit, and not a guarantee of the rate, fees, term, or approval available to any specific business. Final pricing, fees, and approval are set by the lender after the lender's own credit assessment.

3. General information, not advice

Content on this site is general information (class information). It does not take into account the financial situation, objectives, or needs of any particular business or person. Before making a borrowing decision, professional advice from a licensed Financial Advice Provider, a chartered accountant, or a solicitor is widely regarded as the safer frame, particularly where amounts are material or the borrowing involves a personal guarantee.

4. Commercial relationship with Prospa

When a calculator user clicks "see if you qualify", the application hands off to Prospa, our New Zealand SME finance partner. Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a referral commission from Prospa when a referred application converts to a funded loan. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and does not change the rate, fees, or terms Prospa offers the business. We do not claim Prospa is the cheapest or best lender for every applicant. Full disclosure is on our partner page.

5. Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) on this site are general in nature and subject to confirmation by the accountant on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional tax advice from a chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame. Inland Revenue is the primary source for any specific NZ tax-treatment question.

6. Privacy and personal information

Consistent with the Privacy Act 2020, we do not run lead-capture forms on this site. Calculator inputs stay in the browser and are not transmitted to a server we control. We use Google Analytics 4 for aggregate, non-personal traffic data only. When a visitor clicks through to Prospa they leave our site, and Prospa's privacy policy applies. The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) framework applies at the lender level where a sole trader's borrowing is wholly or predominantly for personal use, or where a personal guarantor is involved.

7. Fair dealing posture

This site operates under the fair-dealing requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 2 and the Fair Trading Act 1986. We avoid misleading or deceptive conduct, false representations, and unsubstantiated claims. Numeric or regulatory claims are hedged or sourced to a primary New Zealand authority such as Inland Revenue, MBIE, the Companies Office, WorkSafe, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Stats NZ, the Commerce Commission or the Financial Markets Authority.

8. Limitation of liability and governing law

To the maximum extent permitted by New Zealand law, Lineofcredit.org.nz, its operators and its contributors are not liable for any loss or damage (direct, indirect, consequential, or otherwise) arising from use of the site or reliance on its content, indicative figures, or third-party information. These terms are governed by the laws of New Zealand. Any disputes are to be resolved in New Zealand courts.

Long form: terms, privacy, footer disclaimer.